Science is at a dead end
Euclid was a mathematician who lived more than 2300 years ago in the 3rd century B.C. His most famous work was the Elements, a book in which he deduced the properties of geometrical objects and integers from a set of axioms, thereby establishing the axiomatic method of modern mathematics. Although many of the results in the Elements had originated with earlier mathematicians, one of Euclid's major accomplishments was to present them in a single, logically coherent framework.
Since then, each and every single aspect of human life has changed beyond recognition, except the axiomatic method. This is the problem of science today. It is algorithmic, too much digitized, so to speak. It seems that, at this point in the evolution of humans, the mind is incapable of explaining itself. This is probably because it is fundamentally noncomputational, contrary to the methods of science and rational thinking and what the overwhelming majority of philosophers believe.
Since then, each and every single aspect of human life has changed beyond recognition, except the axiomatic method. This is the problem of science today. It is algorithmic, too much digitized, so to speak. It seems that, at this point in the evolution of humans, the mind is incapable of explaining itself. This is probably because it is fundamentally noncomputational, contrary to the methods of science and rational thinking and what the overwhelming majority of philosophers believe.
